|
Pollution Prevention and Control is a regime for controlling
pollution from certain industrial activities. These activities are identified
in the Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) Regulations, which have
been introduced in UK legislation as part of the implementation of
the EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive
(EC/91/61).
The system of PPC is being introduced over 2000 to 2007,
replacing the previous system of Integrated Pollution Control. This system
is based
on the concept of Best Available Techniques (BAT). Essentially, Operators
must use BAT to control pollution from their industrial activities. The
aim of BAT is to prevent, and where that is not practicable, to reduce
to acceptable levels, pollution to air, land and water from industrial
activities. BAT also aim to balance the cost to the operator against
benefits to the environment.
In the PPC Regulations there are 3 linked
systems of pollution control:
- IPPC covers A(1) installations - regulated across the UK by
the Environment Agency, SEPA or E&HSNI
- Local Authority, LA-IPPC
covers A(2) installations which are regulated by the Local Authorities
- Local
Authority, LAPPC covers Part B installations which are regulated
by the Local Authorities
All of these systems are regulated by a permitting
process. An Operator must apply for a permit from the Regulator, and
when issued this contains
conditions aimed at reducing and preventing pollution to acceptable levels.
A1 installations have the greatest potential to pollute the environment,
then A2, with Part B installations the lowest. Part B processes are only
regulated on emissions to air.
How We Can Help
We can help with you to comply with the PPC Regulations whether you are
an A1, A2 or Part B installation. We provide a cradle to grave Permit
support service, including:
- identifying whether you need a Permit;
- preparation of a permit application;
- management of permit conditions;
- variation of a permit due to operational
changes; and
- surrender of a permit.
We can help you due to the knowledge we have gained
in the interpretation of the Regulations since our technical staff have
worked with the Environment
Agency in the determination of over 100 PPC permits. We can help you
to understand:
Activities Falling Under IPPC
Operators should consult Schedule 1 of the PPC Regulations to identify
whether their activities require a Permit. As these Regulations are complex,
we can help you to identify whether your activities require a Permit.
We can also liaise with the Environment Agency on your behalf to clarify
matters.
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Operators must demonstrate BAT is being applied to control their activities
during the Permit application process. This is assessed during the determination
of the Permit by the Regulator. Failure to demonstrate BAT by the Operator
will lead to Improvement Conditions in the Permit, which must be complied
with. We can use our experience to justify BAT as part of the Permit
application process or in the preparation of reports as part of the delivery
of your Permit Improvement Conditions.
Significance of Environmental Impacts
H1 – we can quantify the impact of your operations on the environment
on your behalf by using the H1 tool preferred by the Regulator
Our expertise
in this complex area has been recognised by the Environment Agency.
Our consultants have been retained by the Environment Agency
to assist in the determination process of applications for permits
to operate under the PPC Regulations.

Permit Application
IPPC PPC Permit Application
Operators of existing installations must submit an application within
a given time window for a Permit to operate an installation under the
PPC Regulations. Developers of new installation must apply for and be
granted a permit prior to commencing operation. Making an application
requires the Operator to explain and justify details of how the site
operates. Because every site is different, each application must be tailored
to contain the details specific to the site.
Supporting information in the application must consider the impacts of
the site in the following areas, assessed against BAT:
- raw Materials use (including Water use);
- energy use (gas, electricity,
steam, etc);
- emissions to air, water, land;
- noise and Odour emissions;
- management procedures and process techniques;
- accident prevention;
and
- monitoring techniques.
The BAT assessments must demonstrate how emissions
are prevented, and where this is not practicable reduced and must include the
subsequent
impacts on the environment from these releases. The application must
demonstrate how BAT is applied or justify why BAT standards are not
required to be met. BAT standards are specified in the form of BREFs,
Sector Guidance
Notes and Technical Guidance Notes.
A Site Report must also be prepared as part of the Permit application,
which describes how the surrounding environment (land, water, habitats,
human dwellings) is affected by the site operations. This must contain
an assessment of the condition of the land, which is used to determine
what work needs to be done to assess existing land contamination.
The application must also demonstrate compliance with a raft of cross-cutting
relevant legislation (e.g. Solvent Emissions Directive, Dangerous
Substances Directive, etc.) which is rigorously checked by the Regulator
during
the Permit determination process.
The Regulators provide guidance on their websites and also provide
an application CD which is specific for each sector.
How We Can Help
ISL Praxis specialises in the preparation of PPC permit applications.
You can either outsource the entire permit application to us or we
can prepare specific sections for you. We can also help by negotiating
on
your behalf with the Regulator to agree the Installation boundary
and permitted activities, which may have a large impact on your permit
fees. In addition, we can help to negotiate a way forwards if you
have
not
applied for a Permit within the given deadline.
We can help to:
- assess the impact of your operations on the environment;
- utilise
the H1 software tool used to assess emission -preferred by the Environment
Agency;
- carry out a habitats assessment;
- produce BAT assessments of your
operations and justify any deviations;
- produce a Site assessment report;
- develop your EP OPRA profile (which
determines the risk of your site and hence your Permit fees);
- produce
a Site Monitoring and Protection Programme;
- produce an Environmental
Management System tailored to your site operations; and
- accident risk
assessments (HAZOP).
Through the work our technical staff
have undertaken with the Regulator, we know exactly what is required to make
an application, enabling
our specialists to produce practical, cost-effective, compliant
solutions for you.
Our expertise in this complex area has been recognised by the Environment
Agency. Our consultants have been retained by the Environment
Agency to assist in the determination process of applications for
permits
to operate under the PPC Regulations.

Permit Conditions
IPPC PPC Permit Conditions
Receipt of a permit represents the beginning of regulatory compliance
for a business and not the end. The Permit will contain a number
of conditions which must be met for compliance. These conditions
require
a number of
ongoing reports to be issued to the Regulator against deadlines
set in the Permit.
For A(1) installations, there are standard
Permit conditions which require the Operator to maintain the effective
operation
of the
activities undertaken
at the installation.
Examples include:
- review of Raw Materials Table;
- waste Minimisation Audit (every 4
years);
- water Use Efficiency Audit (every 4 years);
- review of Waste Recovery/Disposal
Table;
- review of Energy Management System;
- reporting of monitoring data
(quarterly and annual);
- annual Report of performance;
- annual review of fugitive emissions;
- annual review of Environmental
Management System (report of progress against targets); and
- preparation
of Site Protection and Monitoring Programme (SPMP), with 2-yearly
review.
For A(1) installations, there are frequently
Improvement Conditions (ICs) in the Permit. These require the operator
to report on
improvements that
need to be made to in the view of the Regulator justify
BAT. The number of ICs in a Permit may vary and are dependent
on the assessment
made
by the Environment Agency. Typical examples include:
- site Closure Plan;
- water efficiency audit and proposed improvements;
- waste minimisation
audit and proposed improvements;
- energy efficiency audit and proposed
improvements;
- noise Assessment / Noise Management Plan;
- odour Assessment / Odour
Management Plan;
- generation of Environmental Management System / Address
deficiencies within existing Environmental Management System;
- action
plan to meet MCERTS requirements for emissions monitoring;
- generation
of an Accident Management Plan / Address deficiencies within the
existing Accident Management Plan;
- assessment of alternative techniques
and subsequent proposals to reduce emissions;
- assessment of alternative
techniques to determine the best practical environmental option;
- review
against relevant sector guidance note of material containment arrangements
and subsequent improvement proposals;
- emissions monitoring trials
and revision of impact assessment based on monitored data;
- assessment
of alternative techniques and subsequent proposals for prevent releases
of fire water; and
- assessment of alternative raw materials and justification
for selected materials.
How We Can Help
We can provide a complete Permit management service,
by preparing all of your reports on your behalf. It should
be noted that
the Operator has full liability for compliance with the
Permit, but
we can prepare
all reports for you to sign off prior to issue to the
Regulator.
This
is an area in which we have great experience. We currently
provide such a service to one of the largest Food and
Drink Site in the
UK.
Alternatively, you may want us to produce specific
reports on your behalf to meet the requirements of improvement
conditions. Due
to our experience
in the area of PPC Permitting, we understand the levels
of control
that need to be demonstrated to the Regulator. Our thorough
knowledge of BAT
enables us to justify the occasions where BAT is not
possible.
Examples of the reports our consultants have
produced include:
- quarterly Reporting of monitoring data;
- annual emissions reporting;
- performance Reporting;
- emissions Monitoring;
- site closure plan;
- site protection and monitoring program, both
with and without reference data;
- noise management plan;
- noise assessment and proposed action plan;
- odour management plan;
- odour assessment and proposed action plan;
- energy efficiency audit,
with proposed improvements;
- water efficiency audit, with proposed
improvements;
- waste minimisation audit, with proposed improvements;
- waste recovery
/ disposal review, with proposed improvements;
- environmental management
system;
- accident management plan;
- option appraisal of alternative techniques
and recommendations to minimise emissions;
- option appraisal of alternative
techniques to determine the best practical environmental option and
recommendations;
- review of bunding and hardstanding arrangements,
with proposed improvements;
- review of proposed techniques against
MCERTS and recommendations;
- collection of emissions monitoring data
and generation of revised impact assessments using Environment
Agency H1 assessment methodology or air dispersion modelling, as appropriate;
- review
of alternative materials and justification for proposed selection;
and
- review of options to prevent
release of fire water and recommendations.
Our
expertise in this complex area has been recognised by the Environment Agency.
Our consultants have been retained by the Environment
Agency to assist in the determination process of applications for
permits to operate under the PPC Regulations.

IPPC PPC Guidance Environmental
Management System
An Environmental Management System (EMS) is a set of processes
and practices that enable an organisation to reduce its environmental
impacts and increase
its operating efficiency. Due to increasing public
awareness, an EMS is seen as a valuable way for companies
to demonstrate
their commitment to environmental sustainability. Although
many companies
operate
an
informal EMS, the level of regulatory compliance
and environmental improvement
achieved is increased by operating an accredited
EMS (such as ISO
14001 or European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)).
ISL
Praxis can offer you a wide range of EMS related services including:
design of a new EMS and gap analysis of an existing
EMS
leading to accredited status, training of staff, development
of improvement
programmes and
environmental reporting. We have experienced consultants
who can offer guidance as they are fully familiar with EMS
requirements.
Benefits of an EMS
As part of a PPC Permit application, the type and accreditation
level of an EMS is reviewed by the Regulator. During
this review, the operator
and pollution risk of an installation with an EMS
is reduced; therefore the operator permit costs and ongoing
fees
are
similarly reduced.
An EMS can further benefit an organisation by:
- improving control of risk and impacts – e.g. reducing the
environmental impact of its operations;
- ensuring greater awareness
of legislative requirements;
- identifying cost savings through improved
operational efficiency in the use of materials and energy as well
as reductions
in waste production;
- providing a better understanding and greater control of processes
thereby reducing emissions and the risk of pollution incidents;
and
- improving its public image as environmental performance is increasingly
important to the wider community.
Key Components
of an EMS
- an environmental policy including a statement from senior
management outlining the company’s commitment to the
environment;
- an Environmental Improvement Programme
setting objectives and targets;
- clearly defined roles for all employees,
delivering staff ownership and enthusiasm;
- ongoing assessment of the
environmental impacts of an installation - i.e. raw material use,
effluent production etc;
- procedures to control activities that might
have a significant environmental impact;
- defined systems for record
keeping and document control; and
- periodic auditing of the system
(internal or external).
How We Can Help
We can work with you to develop a business case for implementation
of an EMS at your specific site(s). We will
take time to understand your
needs to produce an EMS that fits in with
your existing systems and processes. We can either work with
you as
an advisor
to
help you
to develop an EMS
or we can implement your EMS on your behalf
with your involvement.
ISL Praxis Process for Development of an EMS
We will follow these steps to deliver an EMS that is
relevant to your business need in terms of
size and scope and for
which your
staff feel
ownership:
- Review current environmental
performance, identifying the environmental impact of activities
of the organisation.
This
review will involve
site reconnaissance, interviews with
key staff and identification of relevant
documentation. This review will provide
an understanding of your current position and
define your needs;
- With the input of senior
management write the environment policy. This will
require
the setting
of objectives
and targets to address
significant impacts. These targets
will be used to develop an environmental management
programme;
- Produce a definition of environmental
responsibilities across the company
- Deliver
communication and training to ensure all employees are aware
of EMS issues,
but
with more
focused training
for staff with
environmental
responsibilities;
- Prepare control
procedures and EMS documentation;.
- Audit the EMS and ensure that
corrective actions are carried
out; and
- Lead a management review
of the EMS and establish
the continuous
improvement cycle.
EMS Continuous Improvement Cycle
diagram Best Available Techniques
An essential aspect of the PPC Permitting process involves the operator
in determining how Best Available Techniques (BAT) are or will be applied
to prevent or minimize pollution from the installation. Our industrial
regulation specialists have a thorough knowledge of BAT across the
range of PPC sectors and can help you put together your Permit application.
We can also help you to comply with subsequent Permit conditions by
justifying BAT where appropriate.
The spirit of BAT is that the selection of techniques to protect the
environment should achieve an appropriate balance between the environmental
benefits they bring and the costs to implement them. It is important
that the Operator presents relevant costs and environmental information
to justify the BAT selected.
Environmental regulators across the UK have
produced guidance on BAT, referred to as Horizontal Guidance Note H1, ‘IPPC
Horizontal Guidance Note for Environmental Assessment and Appraisal of
BAT’. This guidance provides a structured approach which addresses
the specific requirements of the PPC Regulations. The methodology employed
consists of two basic components – the assessment of environmental
impacts and the balancing of environmental impacts against costs.
Demonstration of BAT
The H1 Guidance methodology is pictorially described opposite. Each of
the separate modules is a step towards justifying BAT in a clear and
consistent manner.
For a range of options, the effects of emissions on the environment are
quantified, taking into account:
- emissions to air and water;
- deposition to land of airborne emissions;
- the risk of impacts
from accidents;
- effects of noise and odour on local receptors;
- visual impacts
associated with operating the process;
- the potential to cause
global warming by indirect effects;
- potential to cause photochemical
ozone by indirect effects; and
- indirect effects of waste hazard
and disposal.
An assessment of the impact
of these emissions is made with respect to the effects on human health,
quality of the environment, offence to human
senses and damage to material property or amenity value. After this
is completed, the option which represents the lowest impact on
the environment
may be identified. The final step is a cost evaluation if more than
one option is available. A cost evaluation is unnecessary if there
is only
one option.
Permit Application
The operator needs to provide all the information necessary to demonstrate
that the assessment has been fulfilled. This would typically consist
of emissions data and information on the local environment together
with results of the assessment of environmental impacts and costs.
It is also
important to include a description of the interpretation, assumptions
and qualitative judgements made in reaching decisions regarding selection
of BAT or environmental assessment. The regulator needs this information
in order to understand the justification for the decisions made.
Environmental emissions may be quantified using a supplementary H1
software tool, which determines whether these emissions are significant.
The input
data, comments and output pages (e.g. histograms) of the software tool
can be used to provide much of the information. These must be submitted
to the regulator, together with any supplementary information used
in the assessment process (e.g. dispersion modelling reports, etc).
Our industrial regulation specialists can use their extensive knowledge
of the Permitting process to put together your Permit application for
consideration by the regulator.
Illustration of the BAT Process
PPC Horizontal Guidance: Noise
Noise
One of the emissions regulated by the PPC Regulations is Noise and Vibration.
The PPC Permitting process requires the use of Best Available Technology
(BAT) to minimise these emissions. It is important to note that the granting
of a
Permit can represent just the first step of an operator’s management
of noise emissions. Permit conditions often require the formulation of noise
management plans as well as comprehensive noise monitoring programmes as
part of the active management of this issue.
Environmental Regulators across the UK have produced guidance on noise, referred
to as Horizontal Guidance Note H3, ‘Horizontal Guidance for Noise’.
This helps applicants in their assessment of what constitutes BAT for minimising
noise emissions from their installation. It is extremely important to take
into account individual Sector Guidance Notes and European BAT Reference
(BREF) Notes and recognise that noise issues tend to be very site specific.
Justifications
can be made for deviations from national standards on grounds of the technical
characteristics of the installation, its geographical location and local
conditions.
Your obligations relating to Noise under PPC
In order to be granted a PPC Permit an operator must demonstrate that noise
emissions from the installation are minimised using BAT. In determining BAT
across the installation, noise must be considered and balanced within the
wider context of other releases to different media (air, land and water).
This must
also take into account issues such as usage of energy and raw materials.
Noise cannot therefore be considered in isolation from other impacts on the
environment.
The aim of the BAT assessment is to achieve the underpinning of good practice,
the prevention of creeping ambient noise levels, and the prevention of reasonable
cause for annoyance to sensitive receptors.
The granting of a Permit to an
operator represents only the beginning of their regulatory obligations
relating to noise. Permit conditions often require the
generation and implementation of noise management plans, comprehensive
noise monitoring programmes and the identification of noise abatement
options.
How We Can Help
ISL Praxis can offer you a wide range of noise related services including:
- Gap analysis of your installation relative to BAT;
- Formulation
of noise management plans;
- Full monitoring of noise emissions;
and
- Identification of how noise emissions can best be mitigated.
Our industrial
regulation specialists are fully familiar with PPC Regulations and have a practical
knowledge of regulatory interpretation and compliance
issues.
PPC Horizontal Guidance: Odour
Odour
The IPPC Permitting process requires the use of Best Available
Technology (BAT) to minimise odorous emissions. The field of
odour measurement and control is
very wide in scope and is continually developing. The point at which pollution
in the form of offence to the sense of smell is occurring is taken to be the
point at which there is “reasonable cause of annoyance”. The aim
of BAT should be to ensure that there is no reasonable cause of annoyance.
Environmental Regulators across the UK have produced guidance on odour, referred
to as Horizontal Guidance Note H4, ‘Horizontal Guidance for Odour’.
This helps applicants to assess what constitutes BAT for minimising odorous
emissions from their installation. Individual Sector Guidance Notes and European
BREF Notes are also available which outline odour control activities for the
specific activities within each sector. An odour impact assessment needs to
be undertaken and in the case of installations with a history of odour complaints
a detailed odour assessment needs to be submitted. It is important to note
that the granting of a Permit represents just the first step in the management
of odorous emissions by an operator. Permit conditions often require the formulation
of odour management plans as well as comprehensive odour monitoring programmes.
Your obligations relating to Odour under PPC
In order to be granted a PPC Permit, an operator must demonstrate that odorous
emissions are minimised using BAT. In determining BAT across an installation,
odour must be considered and balanced within the wider context of other releases
to different media (air, land and water), and take account of issues such as
usage of energy and raw materials. The aims of BAT are:
- to keep the exposure to odour at sensitive receptors
below the level at which it would give reasonable cause for annoyance;
- to
prevent the generation of odour where possible;
- to contain the
odour and use effective treatment techniques, or other means
of minimising emissions, where prevention is not possible; and
- to
promote the use of good practices for the control of odour,
including adequate maintenance and cleaning, storage, containment
etc.
The granting of
a Permit to an operator represents only the beginning of their regulatory obligations
relating to odour. Permit conditions often require
the
generation and implementation of odour management plans, comprehensive
odour monitoring programmes and the identification of odour abatement
options.
How We Can Help
ISL Praxis can offer you a wide range of odour related services
including:
- gap analysis of your installation relative to BAT;
- formulation
of odour management plans;
- full monitoring of odorous emissions
and dispersion modelling; and
- identification of how odour emissions
can best be prevented or treated at the end of pipe.
Our industrial regulation specialists can offer guidance
as they are fully familiar with PPC Regulations and also have a practical knowledge
of
regulatory interpretation and compliance issues.
PPC Energy Assessment
Energy
The PPC Regulations specifically require that an installation should
be operated in such a way that energy is used efficiently. They also
require a description of the energy used in, or generated by, the installation
to be included in the Permit application. In addition to this, energy
efficiency is one of several considerations that must be taken into account
when considering BAT for the prevention and minimisation of pollution.
Our
specialists have experience in compiling Energy Audits and appraising
energy efficiency measures for compliance with the PPC Regulations. We
can apply our experience to appraise your energy usage and make recommendations
for savings.
Energy use
The starting point for a PPC application is to review the existing in-house
energy management procedures in accordance with Horizontal Guidance Note
H2, ‘Energy Efficiency’. This involves identifying the energy
used and generated on site with reference to the different types of fuel
used. An appraisal of energy efficiency measures is required by reviewing:
- energy recovery;
- efficiency from building services; and
- energy efficiency plans.
All installations must meet a set of defined
basic energy requirements for energy efficiency, which are based on the implementation
of generic
low-cost measures designed to address gross inefficiencies. Those
installations that participate in either a Climate Change Agreement
or Emissions
Trading Scheme Direct Participant Agreement, do not have any other
energy efficiency
requirements. Those installations that do not participate have additional
Permit conditions set by the Regulator to deliver additional energy
efficiency requirements.
How We Can Help
Our specialists can work with you to produce an energy audit as required
by the PPC Regulations. This will identify areas where savings can
be achieved, make recommendations to achieve the savings and estimate
the
cost implications of delivery (including pay-back times). We will
produce cost savings per tonne of CO2, and in this way we can produce
an energy
audit to support climate change levy reduction strategies.
We can help you to fulfil Permit conditions set to deliver energy
efficiency requirements by working with you to produce an energy
plan that is
relevant to your operations at your installation.
PPC Emissions to Air, Land & Water
Emissions to Air, Land & Water
The PPC Permitting process considers emissions from the installation
to specific environmental media identified in the regulations as air,
land (including groundwater) and surface water. Depending upon the toxicological
nature of a discharge, emissions to sewer may also require specific controls.
The measurement and assessment of these emissions is an important part
of the application for a permit and for future compliance with permit
conditions. Our industrial regulation specialists have expertise in taking
measurements and assessing these emissions within the context of appropriate
abatement complying with BAT.
Your emissions obligations under PPC
In order to be granted a PPC Permit an operator must demonstrate that
the emissions from the installation will not cause degradation nor harm
to sensitive human or ecological receptors and habitats. Where emissions
are inevitable, an operator can mitigate the degree of emission by demonstrating
the use of abatement techniques that comply with BAT.
An operator must report emissions to the Regulator on a prescribed timescale.
Reporting may involve emission monitoring requirements, with measurements
taken under MCERTS accredited and/or standard reference systems.
Emissions to Air
- Gases potentially harmful to human health, either short-term
or long term;
- Gases that cause acidification or eutrophication
of surface waters once deposited;
- Gases of climatic concern such
as ozone or carbon dioxide;
- Dust emissions, which can potentially
smother flora or impact on local air quality;
- Dust emissions
that cause visible plumes; and
- Odour (see separate sheet) Must
comply with Solvent Emissions Directive.
Emissions
to Water
- Direct discharges to controlled surface freshwaters, estuaries
and coastal water are assessed with reference to, for example biological
oxygen
demand and toxicological impacts; and
- Must comply with Dangerous Substances
Directive.
Emissions to Sewer
Discharges to sewer are assessed with respect to the levels of
toxics and potential breakdown products. Although these discharges
are by
definition treated by a Sewage Treatment Works (STW), the loading
caused by the
effluent is also considered. The operator is responsible for
demonstrating that off-site STW represents BAT for the specific
site effluent constituents.
Industrial sectors which produce high loadings will often have
an Effluent Treatment Plant located on-site.
Emissions to Land
Direct or fugitive contamination of land is assessed with particular
emphasis on the scope for transmission through permeable soils
and rocks into aquifers, with reference to the Groundwater Regulations
1998. Deterioration
of land contamination is prevented with a view to maintaining
the land
quality after site closure.
How We Can Help
Our specialists understand BAT and corresponding indicative emissions.
We can work with you to identify whether pollutants are captured
by the abatement equipment and where they are not we can work
with you
to provide
the necessary justification or to develop an improvement programme.
We can take measurements to the required standards and interpret
and report
these results on your behalf. We have a thorough understanding
of harm from emissions and this assessment process. We can carry
out measurement
and modelling work on your behalf to ensure compliance with Permit
conditions.
Assessment of Harm from Emissions
The potential for harm from emissions is considered in terms
of their toxicity and/or scope for causing damage to the receptor.
Toxic substances
considered include mercury, cadmium and a range of pesticides
listed in the EC Dangerous Substances List 1 and List 2. The
potential for
harm to human health of a range of gases are identified in Horizontal
Guidance
H1 Appendices C and D.
The quantity of emission is considered with reference to the
net effect on the receiving environmental medium. This requires
the measurement
of emission concentrations and flow rates. This information is
used to model the net contribution to a particular environment
after dispersion.
Models used include the H1 software tool and Air Dispersion Modelling
Systems. Model outputs are used in combination with considerations
of
proximity to sensitive receptors (including habitats) in the
Permit determination to set Emission Limit Values (ELV), with
reference to
defined Environmental
Assessment Levels (EAL) or Environmental Quality Standards (EQS).
PPC Protection of Land
Protection of Land
There is a framework for the protection of land under the PPC Regulations.
This involves the production of an Application Site Report (ASR) prior
to the issuing of a Permit. It also requires the implementation of a
Site Protection & Monitoring Programme (SPMP) within 2 months of
receipt of a Permit as well as site monitoring to the SPMP for the lifetime
of the installation. Finally, a Site Closure Plan is required to demonstrate
protection after closure of the installation.
Our specialists are familiar with the production and implementation of
an ASR and SPMP for a range of industrial sectors. We understand the
precise requirements that the Regulator has for the format and design
of these activities. We can work with you to understand your specific
site requirements and produce an ASR and SPMP for you
Application Site Report
The objectives of the ASR are to undertake a Desk Top study on the activities
and substances used at the installation that may provide a pollution
risk to land now or in the future. This is a critical report as it provides
information on the ground conditions of the site to enable the Regulator
to set Permit conditions to protect the land. It involves the collection
of information to:
- identify environmental setting and pollution history;
- identify
substances that may lead to pollution of the land; and
- identify
preventative measures to protect the land.
The operator must state
in the ASR whether there is either:
- little likelihood that pollution or leaks to land will
occur during the lifetime of the installation.
OR
- a reasonable possibility of current or future pollution
of the land from the installation.
Site Protection & Monitoring
Programme
The Permit will normally have
conditions requiring the operator to implement an SPMP to ensure protection
of the land throughout the lifetime of the
installation. This involves:
- SPMP submitted to the Regulator within two months of
the permit issue;
- reporting of reference data to the Regulator
where this is required;
- collection and reporting of data in accordance
with the SPMP for the lifetime of the installation; and
- assess
effectiveness of prevention measures.
The SPMP will normally require
the operator to assess the continued effectiveness of the pollution prevention
control measures involving
the collection
and analysis of samples and/or the inspection of site infrastructure.
The scope
of the SPMP
is determined by the Regulator’s assessment of ‘little
likelihood’ or ‘reasonable
possibility’ of future pollution, which may agree or disagree
with the operator’s assessment given in the ASR. If ‘little
likelihood’,
then the SPMP will only require a testing, inspection and maintenance
programme to ensure that the site’s pollution prevention measures
are maintained and continue to be effective. If ‘reasonable
possibility’,
then the SPMP will be far broader in its scope and will include the
collection of
reference data. If the potential for ongoing pollution is not removed,
long term environmental monitoring is required.
Site Closure Plan
Under the PPC regime, a Site Closure Plan is needed to demonstrate
the prevention or minimisation of any pollution risk arising from
closure and decommissioning.
Particular attention should be paid to the design of new plant
or equipment, the keeping of appropriate maintenance records and
the
maintenance
of
a Site Closure Plan, which should be fully reviewed at least every
4 years.
How We Can Help
Our specialists will work with you to prepare an:
- ASR - for your site to the standards and format expected
of the Regulator. Specific reference will be made to the Technical
Guidance
IPPC H7, ‘Guidance
on the Protection of Land under the PPC Regime: ASR and SPMP’.
This will involve the following activities:
- desk top review of
all available reference information and reports
- site reconnaissance
to record site based observations
- assessment of existing pollution
prevention measures
- production of ASR
- SPMP - design a SPMP that is relevant to your
site, using the standards and format expected of the Regulator.
Specific reference will be
made to the Technical Guidance IPPC H7, ‘Guidance on the Protection of
Land under the PPC Regime: ASR and SPMP’. This will involve the following
activities:
- design of an investigation to collect reference data (if required)
- design
of a monitoring programme
- design of an information and data management
reporting programme
- reporting the information
- Site closure plan - prepare a Site
Closure Plan on your behalf and provide ongoing support to
ensure that you fulfil your regulatory obligations.

PPC
Raw Materials & Waste
Raw Materials & Waste
The PPC Permitting process requires an installation to assess and minimise
its use of raw materials (including water) and production of
waste. A PPC Permit application requires the submission of information
to demonstrate
this. This should include an action plan to improve the efficiency
of
raw materials use and the minimisation of waste streams. The
Regulator may additionally require the operator to produce an improvement
plan
as a condition of their Permit.
Our specialists have experience
in compiling Water Audits and Waste Audits and associated Improvement
Plans. We can apply our experience
to review
your specific installation and produce a Plan relevant to your
site and the needs of the Regulator.
Raw materials
In order to reduce emissions, consideration of the nature and
quantity of raw materials used in the production process must
be regularly
reviewed by the operator. This is part of the BAT compliance
process, and entails:
- maintenance of raw material inventories;
- periodic review of
the end fate and environmental impact of raw materials, with
a view to replacing them with less environmentally
damaging substances where possible; and
- review of the control of impurities in
certain raw materials which may be unsuitable for emission.
We can support you by undertaking
these reviews and we will apply the relevant sector guidance to your specific
site to
produce a Raw
Materials
Audit. We will incorporate cost benefit analyses to validate
improvements or justify retaining existing practices.
Water use
A Water Audit is a tool which enables an assessment of utilisation
efficiency to be determined. A formal Water Audit should
be conducted every 2 to
4 years but may be required within 1 year of the issue of
a permit if no previous audit has been conducted. Efficiency
may be reported
in the
form of annual water use relative to production quantity.
Water
use can be reduced by means of appropriate recycling, separation
of unused
roof-
and surface-drainage to minimise water transfer to on-site
effluent treatment plant, or technological solutions for
cleaning and washing.
Our specialists can prepare a Water
Audit for you, using sector specific guidance and efficiency
objectives. We will
provide
cost benefit
analyses to validate improvements or justify retaining existing
practices.
Waste Minimisation
Waste minimisation may be defined as “a systematic approach
to the reduction of waste at source, by understanding and changing
processes
and activities to prevent and reduce waste”. This covers
a range of techniques from basic housekeeping through statistical
measurement
to the application of cleaner technologies.
Key operational
features of waste minimisation include:
- ongoing identification and implementation of waste
prevention opportunities;
- active participation and commitment
of staff; and
- monitoring the use of materials and reporting against
key performance measures.
Where waste is produced it should be recovered
unless ‘technically
and economically impossible’ as stated in the IPPC
Directive. If waste is to be disposed of, the operator
must ensure that
the chosen disposal route avoids, or reduces, any impact
on the environment.
Waste
minimisation, and selecting the best environmental waste
disposal option, are of primary consideration in the
PPC Permitting process.
Waste avoidance may in part be
implemented by reducing
raw material used or by recycling waste into processes
where
feasible. Some
wastes can
be used to produce energy, with Combined Heat & Power
plants frequently being used in this respect.
Indicative
BAT guidance suggests a Waste Minimisation Audit should
be undertaken at least every 4 years but
may be
required within 1
year of
the issue of a permit if no previous audit has been conducted.
Our
specialists can use their expertise to undertake a Waste Minimisation
Audit on your site for you. We will
analyse
your use of raw materials,
assess opportunities for reductions and provide an action
plan for improvements. We will follow a basic three-step
process:
- process mapping;
- materials mass balance; and
- action plan
We will use this information to identify and assess opportunities
for improved efficiency, changes in process and waste
reduction.

IPPC PPC Useful Links
www.defra.gov.uk/Environment/ppc/policy.htm
This website contains a links to a variety of information
sources on various aspects of industrial pollution
control, including
the EU Directives,
Regulations and Guidance documents
www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Guidance information on the PPC Regulations is available
from the Environment Agency’s website
www.netregs.gov.uk
A full listing of all PPC legislation is listed from
this part of the Environment Agency’s website
www.sepa.org.uk/ppc/
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency is the main
environmental regulator in Scotland and provides
detailed information on
legislative requirements,
guidance for business, and technical guidance on waste
treatment and disposal.
www.ehsni.gov.uk/environment/industrialPollution/ippc.shtml
The Environment and Heritage Service is the largest
agency within the Department of the Environment in
Northern
Ireland. It takes the
lead in advising on,
and implementing, environmental policy in Northern Ireland.
www.eippcb.jrc.es/
The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
Bureau provides information on best available techniques,
including
BREFs. Information Sheets
Below are a number of documents that contain useful information on the
Pollution Prevention Control Regulations (PPC) and how ISL Praxis can
support you:
-
Integrated Pollution Prevention & Control
- Environmental Management
Systems
- PPC Horizontal Guidance: BAT Assessment
- PPC Horizontal Guidance: Noise
- PPC Horizontal Guidance: Odour
- PPC Energy Assessment
- PPC Emissions to Air, Land & Water
- PPC Protection of Land
- PPC Raw Materials & Waste

Copyright © International Synergies Limited
2007.
. |